![]() This was exactly what Lefebvre was trying to mend. He gave aspatial social roles of production a determinant role. Third approach lay between the two groups.Īccepted the centrality of class relations, but weakly agreed to the dialectic of socio-spatial relations.Ĭastells presented space as a material product emerging dialectically from interaction of culture and nature. ![]() The socio-spatial dialectic 6:59 AM3Ĭentrality of traditional class analysis and neo-Marxist urban and regional analysis is analytically muddled. Resistance to this thought formed another school. Rural v/s Urban, disparities between nations and regions and the revolutionary potential within ‘horizontal’ structure. Not a superstructure but social and spatial relations are dialectically inter-reactive, interdependent, social relations of production are both space forming and space dependent. Then, the relationship between created organized space and other structures within a given mode of production becomes important. This space is a construct comparable to other social constructs, arising from application of human labor. Physical space is organized and interpreted as a product of social translation, transformation and experience. The socio-spatial dialectic 6:59 AM2ĭifference between space as a physical object and created space of social organization. Long lack of recognition leads to skepticism about role of spatial forces. Vertical and Horizontal dimensions of mode of production are suggested in the writings of Marx and Engels. Social and Spatial relations arise from same mode of production and are also dialectically inseparable. Spatial analogy to traditionally defined class relations and conditions of class conflict and structural transformation. Marxists failed to appreciate the essential dialectical relation between social and spatial relationships. Harvey and Castells recognized his contribution in dealing with organization of space as material product.īut does it occupy a very central position?Ĭertain boundaries beyond which it does not have any relevance. ![]() Disagreement on the role of spatial structural forces in modern capitalist society.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |